On October 4, 2024, Woodhull joined our allies from Chamber of Progress, LGBT Tech, and the Coalition for Responsible Home Education in filing an Amicus Brief supporting Netchoice in Netchoice v. Finch. NetChoice v. Fitch is a legal challenge to…
Earlier this year, The Woodhull Freedom Foundation and the Electronic Frontier Foundation submitted a brief to the United States Supreme Court urging the Justices to rule on TX's unconstitutional age verification law. We filed in support of the constitutional challenge…
Woodhull Freedom Foundation joined the Electronic Frontier Foundation in submitting an amicus brief asking the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit to affirm the dismissal of a complaint based on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act…
The Woodhull Freedom Foundation and the Electronic Frontier Foundation submitted our brief to the United States Supreme Court urging the Justices to rule on TX's unconstitutional age verification law. We filed in support of the constitutional challenge brought by the…
Woodhull Freedom Foundation joined the Chamber of Progress and six other organizations in an Amicus Brief challenging California’s Age-Appropriate Design-Code Act (CAADCA), which was initially passed in September 2022. The stated goal of the law is to protect minors' online…
Woodhull Freedom Foundation joined the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and four other organizations to urge the Supreme Court to strike down laws in Florida and Texas that let the states dictate certain speech social media sites must carry, violating the sites’ First Amendment…
The following originally appeared on Electronic Frontier Foundation's website: "Woodhull Freedom Foundation, EFF, and Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University asked the court in a brief filed on June 30th to protect the First Amendment rights of people to access…
The First Amendment protects speech that may be unpleasant, including speech we detest. This Court has long recognized that such speech can be vital for our marketplace of ideas often precisely because it is communicated with an intent and in…
Should it be a federal crime to encourage an undocumented immigrant to remain in the country? In a friend of the court brief filed on February 24, 2023, with the U.S. Supreme Court, we joined Electronic Frontier Foundation, Immigrants Rising, and…
The First Amendment protects speech that may be unpleasant, including speech we detest. This Court has long recognized that such speech can be vital for our marketplace of ideas often precisely because it is communicated with an intent and in…